Twitter on Wednesday took the highly unusual step of blocking links to a thinly sourced New York Post article that appears to have connections to a Russian disinformation campaign targeting Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
A Twitter spokesperson told HuffPost that the article violated the company’s Hacked Materials Policy, noting in particular an absence of information on the origins of the materials that formed the basis of the Post’s reporting.
Readers who attempted to share the story on Twitter were met with a warning that read, “We can’t complete this request because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful.”
The main claims in the Post article, which involve Hunter Biden’s dealings in Ukraine, rest on uncorroborated material provided by Rudy Giuliani, who is President Donald Trump’s personal attorney. Giuliani himself had active ties to a Russian agent pushing conspiracy theories about Joe Biden and his family, which raises concerns about the source of the material Giuliani supplied to the Post.
The Biden campaign flatly denied the Post’s claims.
“The New York Post never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of this story,” campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement. “They certainly never raised that Rudy Giuliani ― whose discredited conspiracy theories and alliance with figures connected to Russian intelligence have been widely reported ― claimed to have such materials.”
“Moreover, we have reviewed Joe Biden’s official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place,” Bates added.
The New York Post didn’t respond to an inquiry from HuffPost regarding the accuracy of the article.
On Wednesday evening, Twitter elaborated on its decision to block the Post article.
The company said its Hacked Materials Policy, established in 2018, “prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials.”
Twitter added that images contained in the article had included “personal and private information,” which also violated its rules.
Facebook’s policy communications director, Andy Stone, tweeted that his company had also reduced the distribution of the story, but didn’t elaborate on how that had been achieved. Facebook didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Facebook’s move was part of the company’s “standard process to reduce the spread of misinformation,” Stone said, and was intended to give third-party fact-checkers time to evaluate the story’s veracity.
Facebook’s fact-checking system has itself received a hearty dose of scrutiny. One of the six fact-checking organizations to which it outsourced the work is a subsidiary of the Daily Caller, a right-wing site with links to white supremacists.
At an Iowa campaign rally on Wednesday, Trump praised the Post’s article about Biden, calling it a “big smoking gun.”
He also lambasted Twitter and Facebook for blocking access to the article, accusing the companies of “trying to protect” Biden from “negative” coverage.
This story has been updated with Twitter’s explanation of its actions and Trump’s comments.
Dominique Mosbergen contributed reporting.
We want to know what you’re hearing on the ground from the candidates. If you get any interesting ― or suspicious! ― campaign mailers, robocalls or hear anything else you think we should know about, email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost’s next chapter